Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
HABIN HARIS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash proceedings due to settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute resolved amicably; all parties agree. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. continuing prosecution serves no purpose; inherent powers invoked. (Para 6 , 7) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 98 OF 2026 --------------------------------------------
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the 10th accused in SC No.51/2022 on the file of the Special Court – Offences under SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989, Kottarakkara, which has originated from Crime No.2215/2020, registered by the Kollam West Police Station, Kollam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 294(b), 427, 447 and 506 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code , Sections 3 and 5 of the Kerala Prevention of Damage to Private property and Payment of Compensation Act, 2019 and Section 3 (2)(va) of SC/ST (PoA) Act, 1989.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surksha Sanhita , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registratio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
