IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
DISHNET WIRELESS LIMITED (AIRCEL) – Appellant
Versus
KARADKA GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in S.T. No.
250/2018 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Kasaragod (‘Trial Court’ for short), which has been registered on the basis of a private complaint filed by the first respondent alleging the commission of an offence punishable under Section 210 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act (‘Act’, for short) read with Section 27 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj (Taxation, Levy and Appeal) Rules.
2. The gist of the allegation in Annexure A3 complaint is that; the petitioner had erected two mobile towers, its shelters and its equipments in the property belonging to a person, which is situated within the territorial limits of the first respondent Panchayat. However, the petitioner failed to pay Rs.1,00,893/- towards arrears of tax payable to the first respondents for the period from 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2017-2018. Thus, the petitioner has committed the above offence.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, even if the allegations in Ann
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.