SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5772

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
RAJINI P V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV,SRI.V.VINAY,SRI.M.S.ANEER,SHRI.SARATH K.P.
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PP.SRI.M.P.PRASANTH

ORDER

The criminal miscellaneous case is filed to quash Annexure II final report and all further proceedings in C.C.No.188/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Hosdurg.

2. When the Crl.M.C., was taken up for consideration, it was brought to the notice of this Court that, charge in the case has already been framed.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, this Court is not inclined to quash the final report, if this Court may permit the petitioner to challenge the order framing charge against the petitioner. I find the above submission to be reasonable.

In light of the above submission, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to work out her remedies, in accordance with the law.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top