Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5777

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
ALAMBATH SHAHIDA – Appellant
Versus
KANDOTH ARIPPAYIL SUBAIDA – Respondent
RSA NO. 690 OF 2025 | AS NO.23 OF 2018 | OS NO.192 OF 2012

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SURENDRAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN, SHRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL, SHRI.ADARSH KURIAN, SHRI.JITHIN S SUNDARAN

Failure to comply with court orders can result in dismissal of an appeal for default.

Headnote:The High Court addressed the procedural non-compliance by the respondents regarding the appeal steps ordered. The case involved multiple respondents, and upon failure to comply, the court concluded that the appeal would be dismissed for default. The final decision reflects the court's authority to manage procedural regularities in appeal proceedings.

Result: The appeal is dismissed for default.

JUDGMENT

It is reported by the Registry that the steps as ordered by this Court against Respondents 1 and 5 have not been taken.

In such circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

EASWARAN S.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5777

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMEASWARAN S., JALAMBATH SHAHIDA – AppellantVersusKANDOTH ARIPPAYIL SUBAIDA – RespondentRSA NO. 690 OF 2025 | AS NO.23 OF 2018 | OS NO.192 OF 2012

Failure to comply with court orders can result in dismissal of an appeal for default.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
ALAMBATH SHAHIDA – Appellant
Versus
KANDOTH ARIPPAYIL SUBAIDA – Respondent
RSA NO. 690 OF 2025 | AS NO.23 OF 2018 | OS NO.192 OF 2012