Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
SUHAIL – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to bank account freezing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussed jurisdiction and legal obligations of banks. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. concluded with directions to banks and police for future compliance. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the
1.
debit freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at the requisition of the Police authorities. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime registered by the Police Authorities against some other persons, in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner is in no way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 & 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 ( BNSS ) and
In spite of service of notice to the Respondent No.4, there
2.
is no appearance for the Respondent No.4. The learned Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting instructions from the Bank, confirmed that the Bank has received the Requisition from the Respondent No.4 for debit freezing of the account of the Petitione
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
