LATHIKA B. vs KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. N. NAGARESH, J
LATHIKA B. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN, SHRI.A.E.ALIYAR
For the Respondents: SRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SC, KSRTC

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28^th day of January, 2026 The judgment in the writ petition was dictated in the open Court. However, before signing the judgment, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that material errors had crept in the writ petition and the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition.

2. I have perused the pleadings. The errors pointed out by the petitioner are serious in nature that it will affect the outcome of the writ petition.

3. In the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, I am of the view that the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach this Court again with a properly constituted writ petition.

Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document