Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. N. NAGARESH, J
LATHIKA B. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2387 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. court observes serious errors warranting withdrawal. (Para 2) |
| 3. court allows withdrawal with liberty to file again. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 The judgment in the writ petition was dictated in the open Court. However, before signing the judgment, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that material errors had crept in the writ petition and the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition.
2. I have perused the pleadings. The errors pointed out by the petitioner are serious in nature that it will affect the outcome of the writ petition.
3. In the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, I am of the view that the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach this Court again with a properly constituted writ petition.
Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
