A statutory revision petition must be considered expeditiously by the relevant authority, ensuring compliance with legal standards.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28^th day of January, 2026 The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:

“i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Ext.P6 and quash the same.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2^nd respondent to grant approval to the appointment of the 1^st petitioner as LPSA from 01.06.2023 with all consequential benefits without delay.

iii) Issue such other and further orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. It is submitted that against Ext.P6, the 1^st petitioner has submitted Ext.P7 Revision Petition under Rule 92 of Chapter XIVA KER. As the 1^st petitioner has already preferred statutory Revision Petition, it would be only just and proper that the 1^st respondent considers the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law expeditiously.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the 1^st respondent to consider Ext.P7 Revision Petition and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the Manager.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE

SR