Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5792

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BIJU THOTTUNGAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJEENA S – Respondent
Contempt Case (C) No. 5 of 2026 | W.P.(C) No. 43498 of 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.AVANEESH KOYIKKARA, SMT.MANJUSHA K.U., SHRI.ASHWIN SUNIL KUMAR, SHRI.FELIX JOHN
For the Respondents: Smt. Vidya Kuriakose

Court found compliance with previous order and closed the contempt case.

Headnote:The Contempt Case

(C) No. 5 of 2026 pertains to allegations of non-compliance with a court order from W.P.

(C) No. 43498 of 2024. The court found that compliance had been achieved. No further directions were deemed necessary, resulting in the closure of the case.

Table of Content
1. claims of non-compliance under scrutiny (Para 1)
2. closure due to compliance (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt Case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 07.10.2025 in W.P.(C) No.43498 of 2024 have already been complied with.

2. If that be the case, no further direction is necessary in this case.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case (C) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5792

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JBIJU THOTTUNGAL – AppellantVersusRAJEENA S – RespondentContempt Case (C) No. 5 of 2026 | W.P.(C) No. 43498 of 2024

Court found compliance with previous order and closed the contempt case.

Headnote:The Contempt Case (C) No. 5 of 2026 pertains to allegations of non-compliance with a court order from W.P.(C) No. 43498 of 2024. The court found that compliance had been achieved. No further directions were deemed necessary, resulting in the closure of the case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BIJU THOTTUNGAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJEENA S – Respondent
Contempt Case (C) No. 5 of 2026 | W.P.(C) No. 43498 of 2024

Headnote:The Contempt Case

(C) No. 5 of 2026 pertains to allegations of non-compliance with a court order from W.P.

(C) No. 43498 of 2024. The court found that compliance had been achieved. No further directions were deemed necessary, resulting in the closure of the case.