SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
FATHIMA ABDUL KHADAR – Appellant
Versus
RAJEENA S – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Smt. Farhana K.H., Shri Muhasin K.M.
For the Respondents: Sr GP Smt Vidya Kuriakose

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt Case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that fee notice is issued to the petitioner. If that is the case, there is no contempt in this case. If the petitioner pays the fee, the Authorized Officer will process the Form-6 application as directed by this Court. If there is any further delay, the petitioner can reopen the contempt.

With the above observation, the Contempt Case (C) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top