SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
Sobhna Ramankutty – Appellant
Versus
Abbas V E – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3123 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.37158 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.AVANEESH KOYIKKARA, SMT.MANJUSHA K.U., SHRI.ASHWIN SUNIL KUMAR, SHRI.FELIX JOHN
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Compliance with previous court directions in contempt proceedings concludes the matter without need for further orders.

Headnote:The court assessed the compliance with the directives specified in the judgment dated 13.08.2025 in W.P.

(C) No.37158 of 2024, concluding that compliance was met and no further directions were necessary. This verification led to the closing of the contempt case. The court affirmed, 'no further direction is necessary in this case.'

Table of Content
1. initial consideration of compliance with court directives. (Para 1)
2. closure of contempt case due to confirmed compliance. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

When this Contempt Case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 13.08.2025 in W.P.(C) No.37158 of

2024 have already been complied with.

2. If that be the case, no further direction is necessary in this case.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case (C) is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top