SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5799

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SIMON K FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.R.RAJESH, SMT.SANDHYA E.S.
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : (i) “Issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of Ext. P4 application in Form 5 filed U/Rule 4(4D) of the Rules dehors the decisions contained in Exts. P5 and P7 of the 5th respondent, within the shortest time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

(ii) Issue such other appropriate writ, direction or order as the case may be;

(iii) Issue an order dispensing with the production of the true English translation of the exhibits, produced along with this writ petition, which are in vernacular.”[sic]

2. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that Form-5 application is already rejected by order dated 25.05.2025. If that is the case, no further direction is necessary.

Recording the submission of the Government Pleader, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top