IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ROOPA M – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR RR KOZHIKODE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"I. To issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate order, writ or direction directing the 1st respondent to pass orders allowing Form 6 application Exhibit P2, submitted by the petitioners and making necessary corrections in the revenue records in a time frame set by this Honourable court.
II. to pass such other writ order or direction that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;
III. to pass an order to dispense off with the translation of documents in vernacular language”
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application submitted by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P2 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.