SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5826

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
K.K.HARIDASAN – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.HARIHARAN, PRAVEEN.H, K.S.SMITHA, A.R.SINDHU, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, AFNA V.P, V.ROHITH
For the Respondents: MOHAN JACOB GEORGE, P.V.PARVATHY, REENA THOMAS, NIGI GEORGE, ANANTHU V.LAL, SHERIN VARGHESE, BRAHMA R.K, ANTONY THOMAS MOHAN

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026)

The prayers in the OP(DRT) are as follows;

“(i) Direct the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam to consider S.A No 997/2024 pending before that Tribunal at an early date.

(ii) Direct the Debt Recovery Tribunal -I, Ernakulam postpone the proposed E Auction schedule to be conducted on 09.12.2025 as evidenced by Exhibit P16 notice till a decision taking note of the various contentions raised by the petitioner in that application.

And (C) Pass such other orders or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice”.

The learned counsel for the respondent bank on instructions submits that they have already released the item or property which is given as secured assets. Therefore, the question of E-sale does not arise for consideration. In such circumstances, the OP(DRT) stands closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top