SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5854

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
P MADHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.D.VIMAL DEV
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA S

C.S.DIAS, J.

---------------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No. 11413 OF 2025 ----------------------------------------------

Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026 ORDER The petitioner has asserted in the Crl.M.C. that he was the accused in ST No.7/2020 on the file Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur (Trial Court). By Annexure A1 judgment, the Trial Court had convicted and sentenced the petitioner for committing an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (‘N.I.Act’, in short). Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has preferred Crl.Appeal No.85/2025 before the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Tirur (Appellate Court). Along with the appeal, the petitioner has also filed an application to suspend the execution of the sentence and to waive the payment of the compensation amount. By Annexure-A3 order, the Appellate Court allowed the application and granted the petitioner further period of 30 days from 03.10.2025 to remit 20% of the compensation amount. Unfortunately, the petitioner could not remit the compensation amount within the prescribed time period. Accordingly, he filed a fresh application before the Appellate Court se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top