Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
VAISHAK S.KURUP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner disputes staff reduction based on student absences. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. examination of processes surrounding staff fixation orders. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court underscores necessity for uid compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments presented regarding statutory compliance of orders. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. judgment emphasizes procedural discrepancies in staff fixation. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. final decision mandates reconsideration of extant orders. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT Dated this the 27th day of January, 2026 The petitioner, who is the approved Manager of the Aided School, SKVLPS, Kanjirathinkal, Meyyannoor, Kollam, submits that the 4th respondent issued Ext.P1 Staff Fixation Order for the Academic Year 2023-2024. As per Ext.P1, there were 35 students as per the sixth working day report and 32 students with valid UID, based on which nine regular posts of LPST, including Junior Language Teacher (Arabic), were sanctioned.
2. The rivals of the petitioner submitted a complaint against the petitioner, pursuant to which the Super Check Cell attached to the office of the 2nd respondent conducted surprise inspections in the School on 27.02.2024 and 07.03.2024. It was found that 10
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
