Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
C.A. ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges tribunal's denial of pension benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on petitioner's service history and claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 19) |
| 4. analysis of supervisory jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. conclusion affirming the tribunal's decision. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna S., J.
The petitioner, who is the applicant in T.A.No.525 of 2014 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this Original Petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging the order dated 20.06.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that Transfer Application.
2. The petitioner-applicant herein filed W.P.(C)No.25799 of 2007, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking the following reliefs;
“i) Call for the records leading to Ext.P11 and quash the same to the extend the same denying petitioner’s pension and ex-gratia pension by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate order or directions
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any othe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
