Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
ROHINI – Appellant
Versus
SEENA.V. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. domestic violence claims establish grounds for court intervention. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. prior unresolved judgments regarding property rights impact case outcomes. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. the court affirmed the appellate court's decision based on sound reasoning. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The reliefs granted to an aggrieved person in a petition filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act , 2005 by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court are under challenge in this revision at the instance of the respondents 2 to 5 in the proceedings before the Trial Court. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred hereinafter in their capacities as the petitioner and the respondents respectively, as they figured in the proceedings before the Trial Court in M.C.No.116/2011.
2. The petitioner is the wife of late Premkumar who was the son of late N.Raveendran, arraigned as the first respondent, and Rohini, the second respondent. The first respondent in the M.C passed away during the pendency of the proceedings before the Trial Court. Respondents 3 and 5 in the M.C were the sisters of the deceased husband of the petitioner. The 4th respondent is the husband o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
