Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5930

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
NADEEM SHAH R. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41356 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JASNEED JAMAL, SRI.P.SAMSUDIN, SMT.LIRA A.B., SMT.DEVIKA E.D., SHRI.MOHAMMED NIYAS
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY

The court upheld the petitioner's right to withdraw the writ petition, recognizing procedural correctness.

Headnote:The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted by the court. The court stated that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The order reflects the court's recognition of the petitioner's request to discontinue the case, fulfilling procedural requirements.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document