SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. GOPINATH P., J
PALLICHAL FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.T-677 – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1456 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:ADVOCATE M.MANIKANTAN, SRI.C.S.MANU, SRI.DILU JOSEPH, SRI.C.A.ANUPAMAN, SHRI.T.B.SIVAPRASAD, SMT.MANJU E.R., SRI.C.Y.VIJAY KUMAR, SRI.ANANDHU SATHEESH, SRI.ALINT JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SRI V.K SUNIL (GP)

Petitioner cannot challenge inspection notice without addressing concerns to competent authority per Section 66 of the Act.

Headnote:This writ petition seeks to challenge an order pertaining to inspection under Section 66 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The court noted that the petitioner cannot challenge the notice at this stage and must present their contentions before the appropriate authority if further actions arise. The court affirmed the need for compliance with prior statutory processes and closed the writ petition accordingly.

Table of Content
1. court affirms petitioner's obligations to address issues to relevant authority. (Para 2)
2. conclusion enforces prior statutory processes before proceeding. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1 order directing an inspection in terms of the provisions contained inSection 66of the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act, 1969.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has no right to challenge the notice at this stage and in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Kudayathoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. , v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General); 2022 (3) KLT 222 (FB), the petitioner has to take up all contentions before the competent authority if any further action is taken on the report to be prepared under the provisions of the Section 66 of the 1969 Act.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and having perused the law laid down by the Full Bench in Kudayathoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (supra), I am of the view that the learned Government Pleader is right in contending that the petitioner cannot at this stage challenge any notice directing the holding of an inspection in terms of the provisons contained in Section 66 of the 1969 Act and it is for the petitioner to take up all contentions before the competent authority, if and when further proceedings are initiated against the petitioner. Accordingly reserving the right of the petitioner to raise all contentions before the competent authority if any further proceedings are initiated against the petitioner, this writ petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top