SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SIDIRATH V. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED (KSFE) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3724 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ATHUL SHAJI, SHRI.GAUTHAM H.
For the Respondents: SRI. P.C.ANILKUMAR, SC

The court can permit deferment of coercive recovery actions upon structured repayment terms being established.

Headnote:This case involved a writ petition where the petitioner sought to defer coercive actions regarding pledged gold dues until their representation was considered. The petitioner, having availed loans totaling Rs.17,55,072, requested time for repayment. The court directed that the repayment be accepted in twelve monthly installments, provided the petitioner complied, suspending recovery actions while awaiting compliance. Final decision: 'The writ petition is disposed of.'

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks time for repayment of gold loan liabilities. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondent's willingness to accept repayment in installments. (Para 3)
3. court's direction for installment repayments to avoid coercive action. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The limited relief sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to the respondent to defer the coercive proceedings in respect of the gold ornaments pledged until the consideration of his representation.

2. Petitioner had availed two gold loans from the respondent. The loans were availed for a period of one year, and despite expiry of the said period, he failed to repay the amount. Petitioner submitted that the gold pledged by him would be sold. In such circumstances, he has approached this Court seeking a breathing time for repayment of the loan.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent, upon instructions, submitted that the total liability due from the petitioner as on 31.01.2026 is Rs.17,55,072/- and that, if the petitioner is willing to repay the amount within a reasonable time, they are willing to accept the same in reasonable instalments.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent, I am satisfied that the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent to accept repayment of the total liability of Rs.17,55,072/- along with future interest and costs, due under the two loans availed by the petitioner in 12 equated monthly instalments, of which the first instalment shall be payable on 28.02.2026, and the remaining instalments on the 28th of every succeeding month. If the petitioner complies with the above conditions, the recovery proceedings initiated to sell the gold pledged by the petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance. Needless to mention, if in case, petitioner commits default in any two consecutive instalments, the respondent shall be at liberty to initiate coercive proceedings to recover the amount, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top