Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SIRAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused filed for quashing of proceedings based on delayed fir. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute between parties settled. (Para 3) |
| 3. court observes no purpose in continued proceedings. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.223/2017 of Nilambur police station, now pending as L.P.No.14/2018 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nilambur, filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 450 , 376, 506 of IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that on one day between 01.01.2007 and
31.12.2009, at about 3.00 p.m., the accused trespassed into the residence of the defacto complainant and committed rape upon her after threatening that he is in possession of her naked photographs and that it will be disclose to the outside world.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant were settled and therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
4. Though as per the pros
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
