SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6103

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
VIJAYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2779 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.BLAZE K.JOSE
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Continuation of custody to a grandparent recognized as justified based on prolonged care.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the petition under Section 482 Cr.PC concerning the custody of a minor victim involved in Crime No.47 of 2019. It noted that the petitioner, the victim's grandmother, has been in custody of the victim for the last seven years, determining that continuity in custody was just. The key issues framed included the legality of the earlier custody order while the Court's findings emphasized the petitioner's prolonged custody as a decisive factor. Ultimately, the interim custody granted earlier was made absolute.

Table of Content
1. petition for custody by grandmother. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court recognizes petitioner's continued custody. (Para 3)

O R D E R

(Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026)

The grandmother of the victim, aged 9 years, involved in Crime No.47 of 2019 of Vattappara Police Station, filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.PC challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge for the trial of the cases relating to Atrocities and Sexual Violence Against Women and Children, Thiruvananthapuram, dated 14.03.2019 rejecting her application for getting the custody of the victim and for allowing the custody of the victim girl to the petitioner.

2. The prayer for granting custody of the minor child to the petition was rejected by the learned Sessions Judge as per Annexure-3 order on 14.03.2019. However, at the time of arguments, the learned Public Prosecutor has passed over to me the order of this Court dated 07.08.2019 in which the interim custody of the minor victim was given to the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even now the petitioner is in custody of the minor victim and that now the victim is aged 16 years. Since the petitioner has been in custody of the minor victim for the last 7 years, I hold that it will be only just and proper to permit the victim to continue with the custody of the petitioner.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is allowed, the interim custody of the minor victim given to the petitioner as per order dated

26.06.2019 is made absolute.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top