Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
AMSHAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused in c.c no. 421 of 2025 facing allegations under ipc. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments raise doubt on allegations sufficiency. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. no specific allegations warrant quashing. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The petitioners are the accused persons involved in C.C No. 421 of
2025 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Palakkad, arising out of Crime No. 838 of 2024 of Kuzhalmannam police station. The offence alleged against the petitioners are under Section 498A r/w 34 of the IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that the 1st accused, being the husband of the defacto complainant and the other accused persons being his relatives subjected her to cruelty both physically and mentally on the ground of dowry and thereby they are alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, even if the entire allegations levelled against the petitioners are believed as such, the same does not constituted the offence punishable under Section 498A and therefore they prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioners.
4. Though notice was served on the 3rd respond
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
