Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
SHINTO THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
JYOTHI M – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges related to custody arrangements and the significance of the child's welfare. (Para 1 , 4 , 8) |
| 2. detailed examination of the parties' history concerning the child's custody. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 12) |
| 3. court’s rationale in confirming the family court's order. (Para 9 , 15) |
| 4. considerations on the arrangement made for the child's interest and safety. (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
Devan Ramachandran , J.
The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order of the learned Family Court, Kasaragod, through which, his child has been given in interim custody, pending OP No.873/2025, to the first respondent herein - who is her biological mother.
2. The facts we see in this case are rather strange but distressing.
3. The petitioner and the first respondent were married; but have matrimonial disputes between them and thus arose contest qua custody of the child.
4. We do not propose to enter into the details of the contentions and facts any further because, we are fully aware that the matter is pending before the learned Family Court; particularly since any observation of ours would have the effect of interfering with the processes there.
5. Suffice to say, the child was with the mother and it is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
