Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SANGEETHA G – Appellant
Versus
CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE, KOTTAYAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19587 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.MANAS P HAMEED
For the Respondents: SRI SUNIL NATH, GP

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous if circumstances change, rendering the petition irrelevant.

Headnote:The court analyzed the writ petition filed under WP

(C) NO. 19587 OF 2023, initiated by Sangeetha G, suggesting it had become infructuous. Consequently, the court determined that the petition should be dismissed. The primary issue framed was the relevance of the petition in light of changed circumstances. The court concluded that the writ petition lacked necessary grounds for continuation.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31^st day of January, 2026 Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JSANGEETHA G – AppellantVersusCHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE, KOTTAYAM – RespondentWP(C) NO. 19587 OF 2023

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous if circumstances change, rendering the petition irrelevant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SANGEETHA G – Appellant
Versus
CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE, KOTTAYAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19587 OF 2023