DR.KRISHNA SREENIVAS vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6116

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6116

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
DR.KRISHNA SREENIVAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.FAZIL, SRI.SAJU THALIATH, SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ, SMT.R.SRUTHY, SHRI.FADIL FAZIL, SRI.JITHIN PAUL VARGHESE, SMT.C.PRABITHA, SMT.ANN MARY FRANCIS
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.G.PRAMOD, SENIOR G.P., SRI JIBU, GP

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31^st day of January, 2026 Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6116

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JDR.KRISHNA SREENIVAS – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
DR.KRISHNA SREENIVAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent