Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ELIZA J. PAUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 30161 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM), SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR, SRI.SABU PULLAN, SRI.GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN, SHRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN, SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN, DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.G.PRAMOD, SENIOR G.P., SRI SUNIL NATH, GP

The Court determined that the grievances regarding the amendment in the prospectus were satisfied by an interim order, allowing participation in the allotment.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The judgment relates to amendments in the prospectus affecting the petitioners' ability to submit options in the mop-up round (referenced G.O. (MS) Nos. 112, 226, and 244 of 2023). Facts of the Case: The petitioners challenge the amendment and initially sought to submit options, permitted by the Court's order on 14.09.2023.

Findings of Court:
Grievances were addressed; no further orders are required.

Issues: The main question pertains to the legality of the amendment preventing fresh allotment options.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that the interim order resolved the issues raised by the petitioners.

Result: This writ petition would stand closed in terms of the interim order dated 14.09.2023.

Table of Content
1. challenge to amendment restricting options (Para 1 , 2)
2. interim order sufficient to resolve grievances (Para 3)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking to challenge an amendment in the prospectus on account of which they are not in a position to submit fresh options in the mop-up round and also to participate in the fresh allotment.

2. While admitting the writ petition on

14.09.2023, this Court had permitted the petitioners to submit fresh options and also to participate in the third round of allotment.

3. In view of the aforementioned interim order, I am of the opinion that the grievances of the petitioners in this writ petition are redressed and no further orders are required to be passed.

Hence, this writ petition would stand closed in terms of the interim order dated 14.09.2023.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JELIZA J. PAUL – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 30161 OF 2023

The Court determined that the grievances regarding the amendment in the prospectus were satisfied by an interim order, allowing participation in the allotment.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ELIZA J. PAUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 30161 OF 2023