SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ELIZA J. PAUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM), SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR, SRI.SABU PULLAN, SRI.GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN, SHRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN, SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN, DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.G.PRAMOD, SENIOR G.P., SRI SUNIL NATH, GP

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking to challenge an amendment in the prospectus on account of which they are not in a position to submit fresh options in the mop-up round and also to participate in the fresh allotment.

2. While admitting the writ petition on

14.09.2023, this Court had permitted the petitioners to submit fresh options and also to participate in the third round of allotment.

3. In view of the aforementioned interim order, I am of the opinion that the grievances of the petitioners in this writ petition are redressed and no further orders are required to be passed.

Hence, this writ petition would stand closed in terms of the interim order dated 14.09.2023.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top