J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition contending that he has not been considered for admission to the three year LLB Course on account of the non-production of an eligibility certificate from the 3^rd respondent.

2. While admitting this writ petition on

10.10.2023, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 were directed to admit the petitioner to the Course on the basis of Ext.P10 certificate.

3. Sri.Dhulkar Shan, representing Sri.Arun Thomas, the learned counsel for the petitioner, points out that subsequently the eligibility certificate has been obtained, and the same has been produced before the respondents. 4. This statement is also endorsed by Sri.Surin George Ipe, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent – University.

5. In view of the aforesaid submission, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required in this writ petition, and the same would stand closed, recording the above submission.

Needless to say, the admission of the petitioner to the Course requires to be regularised, in the light of the eligibility certificate produced by him.

Sd/-