Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SRI.P.SHAHEED

The court affirmed the dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed, indicating the absence of ongoing claims from the petitioners.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition under WP

(C) NO. 36430 OF 2023, where the petitioners sought judicial review of a decision related to dairy development, ultimately deciding that the petition was dismissed as not pressed. The court found that there were no further issues warranting a ruling on the merits of the case. The final decision made by the court affirms this dismissal, indicating that the petitioners have effectively withdrawn their claims or are no longer pursuing the matter.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed.

Recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :