Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
G.SHAJIKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH(ICAR) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assails tribunal's decision on the transfer order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against the transfer cite health and communication issues. (Para 4) |
| 3. court reiterates non-interference if transfer is solidly within administrative needs. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final ruling confirmed dismissal of the original petition. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI ,J The present Original Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 01.01.2026 passed in Original Application No.320/2025 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, whereby it has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is presently working as a Technical Officer (Driver Grade V) in the Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (CTCRI), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, which is an institution functioning under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). Vide order dated 25.06.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, the petitioner has been transferred from Thriuvananthapuram to ICAR-CTCRI Regional Office at Bhubaneswar, Orissa. Being aggrieved, the petitioner approached the Tribunal by challenging the transfer order o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
