Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
ANOOP JACOB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1991 OF 2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed to quash proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner acquitted in trial renders matter infructuous. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
==========
This Crl.M.C. is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash all further proceedings in S.C.No.620 of 2017 on the file of the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Ernakulam
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Advocate Smt.Nivedita Rajeev, representing Sri.S.Rajeev, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous insofar as the petitioner already stands acquitted in the trial that followed in S.C.No.620 of 2017. 3. In view of the subsequent developments, nothing further remains to be considered in the Crl.M.C. This Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
