IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
AJI VASU – Appellant
Versus
STATE TAX OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 321 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. taxpayer's eligibility for input tax credit based on timely filings. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's analysis of section 16(4) and section 16(5). (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the registered taxpayer under the provisions of the CGST/KSGST Act. The grievance highlighted by the petitioner is with respect to the Ext.P3 order passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act , declining the Input Tax Credit claimed by the petitioner for the year 2018-2019. The reason on which the claim rejected was that the petitioner failed to submit the monthly returns for all the months, within the time limit stipulated under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act . The challenge raised by the petitioner is mainly on the ground that, in the light of Section 16(5), which is introduced subsequently, the petitioner is entitled to get the Input Tax Credit in view of the fact, that the petitioner submitted the returns for all the relevant months before the cut off date, namely, 30.11.2021, contemplated under Section 16(5) of the Act.
2. On perusal of Ext.P4, which is the screenshot from the dashboard of the petitioner, in portal, it is evident that the petitioner submitted the monthly returns for the relevant months, during the period from 10.01.2020 to 30.09.2020 and thus all the returns were filed before the cut-off date contemplated under Section 16(5) of the Act. It is also to be noted that, Section 16(5) starts with the wording “Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (4)”, therefore, if the returns are submitted within the cut-off date contemplated under Section 16(5) of the Act, the timeline fixed for submitting the returns under Section 16(4) losses its significance. Therefore, I am of the view that, as it is evident from the records that the petitioner had fulfilled the conditions imposed under Section 16(5), he is entitled to get the benefit of the same.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, quashing Ext.P3, with a direction to the 1st respondent to reconsider the matter and grant the benefits of Section 16(5), if the petitioner is otherwise eligible to the same. An order in this regard shall be passed, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is further ordered that, in the event of the Input Tax Credit being granted to the petitioner, the petitioner shall be entitled to claim refund of the amount, if any, remitted based on Ext.P3, by submitting appropriate application.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.