Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JAZIL DEV FERDINANTO
For the Respondents: SHRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR, SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN

The judgment emphasizes the effect of loan repayment on the closure of disputes in civil petitions.

Headnote:The High Court addressed WP

(C) NO. 278 OF 2025, where the petitioner informed that the loan amount due to the Guruvayur Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. had been remitted and the account closed. The court acknowledged this submission and consequently closed the writ petition. The ruling underscored the importance of repayment in resolving debt disputes, with the final order being that the petition is closed.

JUDGMENT The counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount due to the Bank has been remitted and the loan account stands closed.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :