Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
DR GRACY SATHYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2189 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.RAJEEV, SHRI.SIDHARTH G., SRI.NAVEEN RADHAKRISHNAN
For the Respondents: SMT.AMMINIKUTTY K.

Court permits withdrawal of writ petition, allowing approach to appropriate forum.

Headnote:The court considered the petitioner's request for withdrawal of the writ petition and granted liberty to pursue an appropriate forum, leading to dismissal as withdrawn. The court's decision was based on the counsel's application submitted on 30.01.2026. The outcome rendered the writ petition dismissed with liberty intact.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JDR GRACY SATHYAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 2189 OF 2026

Court permits withdrawal of writ petition, allowing approach to appropriate forum.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
DR GRACY SATHYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2189 OF 2026