SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SABURAJAN. P. G. – Appellant
Versus
KSFE LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3168 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.N. Sathish Kumar, Sujatha E.R.
For the Respondents: P.C. Anilkumar

This judgment clarifies installment repayment conditions for debts under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: Under Section 7 and Section 34 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968, the petitioner seeks to direct respondents to allow repayment of dues. Facts: The petitioner, following defaults in a chit loan, sought relief to repay Rs. 7,44,864 in installments. Court Findings: The respondents expressed willingness to accept installments.

Issues: The main question addressed was repayment terms for the petitioner's dues.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found merit in petitioner’s request for installment repayments, contingent on compliance.

Result: The court directed that payment be accepted in 15 monthly installments, with specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks installment repayment. (Para 2)
2. respondents' willingness to accept payments. (Para 3)
3. court direction for repayment terms. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The limited relief sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to permit him to repay the entire liability due from him in 20 monthly instalments.

2. Petitioner was a subscriber to a chit conducted by the first respondent in the year 2018 and also availed a chit loan. Subsequently, he failed to remit the payment towards the loan as well as the subscription towards the chit. Consequently, coercive proceedings have been initiated against him. Hence, this writ petition.

3. The learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents 2, 3 and 4, upon instructions, submitted that liability due from the petitioner as on 31.01.2026 is Rs.7,44,864/- and that the said respondents are willing to accept the repayment in reasonable instalments.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and the learned Government Pleader, I am satisfied that the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to respondents 2 and 4 to accept repayment of the total liability of Rs.7,44,864/- along with future interest and costs, due from the petitioner in 15 equated monthly instalments, of which the first instalment payable on 28.02.2026, and the remaining instalments payable on the 28th of every succeeding month. It is clarified that, the recovery proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 and Ext.P3 notices shall be deferred provided the petitioner complies with the above conditions. Needless to mention, if in case, petitioner commits default in any one instalment, the respondents shall be at liberty to initiate coercive proceedings to recover the amount in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top