Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.S.SIVAJI, SMT.DHANYA SREENIVASAN, SMT.PARVATHY B.
For the Respondents: SMT.M.S.KIRAN

The court acknowledged that the writ petition held no further matters for consideration and hence closed it.

Headnote:The petitioner, Geethu. G Nair, filed a writ petition concerning the Indian Medicine Central Council regulations. The court observed that no further issues remain for consideration in the case. Consequently, the writ petition was ordered to be closed.

Table of Content
1. no further issues remain in the writ petition. (Para 1)
2. the case is ordered to be closed. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition.

2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is closed.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :