Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6147

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Sibichan – Appellant
Versus
Thomas Antony – Respondent
RP NO. 1352 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO.39079 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.B.Pramod, Shri.Biju Vigneswar
For the Respondents: Sri.R.Krishnakumar, Sri.T.Naveen, Sri.Darsan Somanath

Review petitions can be dismissed when not pursued by the petitioners.

Headnote:In reviewing RP No. 1352 of 2023 against WP

(C) No. 39079 of 2023, the court noted that the review petitioners chose not to pursue the review. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed. The outcome indicates the petitioners' withdrawal of their appeal as stated by their counsel.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the review petitioners submitted that the review petitioners are not pressing the review petition.

Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6147

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBechu Kurian Thomas, JSibichan – AppellantVersusThomas Antony – RespondentRP NO. 1352 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO.39079 OF 2023

Review petitions can be dismissed when not pursued by the petitioners.

Headnote:In reviewing RP No. 1352 of 2023 against WP(C) No. 39079 of 2023, the court noted that the review petitioners chose not to pursue the review. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed. The outcome indicates the petitioners' withdrawal of their appeal as stated by their counsel.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Sibichan – Appellant
Versus
Thomas Antony – Respondent
RP NO. 1352 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO.39079 OF 2023

Headnote:In reviewing RP No. 1352 of 2023 against WP

(C) No. 39079 of 2023, the court noted that the review petitioners chose not to pursue the review. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed. The outcome indicates the petitioners' withdrawal of their appeal as stated by their counsel.