SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6149

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
BABY JACOB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 45861 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: DR.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN, SHRI.ASVINO SHEEJ.S
For the Respondents: SRI. SREEJITH V.S., SR.GP

The court mandates timely processing of renewal applications for professional certifications, ensuring concerned parties are heard.

Headnote:This judgment concerns a writ petition for the renewal of a Notary Certificate. The petitioner, who is also an Advocate, claims undue delay in processing their application due to unresolved complaints. The court finds the delay improper and directs the relevant authorities to take appropriate actions within three months, ensuring the petitioner is given a hearing. Thus, the petition is disposed of with this direction.

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims to be an advocate as well as a notary. (Para 1)
2. the application delay and complaints against the petitioner. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court directs timely action on the renewal application. (Para 4)
4. outcome of the judgment to dispose the writ petition. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner claims to be an Advocate with Roll No.K/1953/99. He was also appointed as a Notary by the State Government. Since his registration as a Notary was about to expire, he applied for its renewal, and its acknowledgment is evident from Ext.P3. The renewal fee has also been paid as is evident from Ext.P4. Despite the above, the petitioner’s application has neither been disposed of nor renewed.

2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the application for renewal has not been disposed of since the petitioner had not responded to certain queries in connection with certain complaints received against the petitioner’s renewal.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that one of the complaints was at the behest of his former wife, with whom matrimonial disputes pending. It is also submitted that the petitioner would certainly respond if he is intimated about any complaint.

4. Not withstanding the above submissions, I am of the view that the above application for renewal has already been received by the 2nd respondent, appropriate orders will necessarily have to be passed thereon. It is not proper to sit over such application indefinitely.

5. Hence, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the application for renewal of the certificate of practice as a Notary as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within an outer period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top