Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
...... – Appellant
Versus
...... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. evidence of marriage and victim's affidavit are crucial for case quashing. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court emphasizes the importance of family harmony and genuine settlements. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. verdict allows quashing of proceedings based on established grounds. (Para 10) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 9TH MAGHA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 11615 OF 2025 CRIME NO.682/2022 OF MATTANCHERRY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.19 OF 2023 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT (VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN & CHILDREN), ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX BY ADV SHRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS / VICTIM AND STAT E :
1 XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 BY ADV SMT.A.THEJOMAYEE DEVI OTHER PRESENT:
SMT. C.SEENA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The petitioner is the accused in crime No.682/2022 of Mattan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
