IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHEHIN C A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against the petitioner arising from a fabricated document for travel. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense arguments claiming no culpability due to fabrication by others. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. judicial review emphasizes limited scope; trial court to assess evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 1st accused in C.C.No.264/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First-Class Magistrate, Angamaly (Trial Court), which has originated from Crime No.903/2021 registered by the Nedumbassery Airport Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 465 and 471 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 .
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that; to enable the 1st accused to pursue an Msc IBM course in the United Kingdom, the 3rd accused fabricated a Secondary School Certificate of the Maharashtra State Board of Secondary Education and a Provisional Certificate and mark list issued by Madurai Kamaraj University, and handed over the documents to the 1st accused with the assistance of the 2nd accused. Using the afore fabricated documents, the 1st accused secured a visa to travel to the United Kingdom. However, C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.