Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
POORNIMA AJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks direction to release admission documents. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsels confirm documents returned under interim order. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition closed as infructuous. (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to release the original certificates/documents submitted by him while securing admission to the respondent – college.
2. I have heard Sri. B Mohan Lal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Sri. Tony George Kannanthanam, the learned counsel for the respondent –
college.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that, on the basis of the interim order granted by this Court, the respondent-college has already returned the certificates/documents submitted by the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing further remains for consideration in this writ petition, and the same would stand closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
