Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
KUNJU MATHEWS P. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to land classification and ownership rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. hearing and legal representation for reconsideration. (Para 4) |
| 3. judicial observations on bureaucratic mistakes. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking to challenge Exts.P4, P10 and P12 orders and also seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to reconsider Ext.P6 complaint afresh in the light of Ext.P11 Government Order.
2. The petitioner is stated to be in ownership and possession of 17.40 Ares of land in Survey No.465/5 of Block 3 of Kidangannur Village. As per Ext.P1, the petitioner contends that he was remitting land tax also with respect to the property in question. The property was lying low compared the neighboring properties and according to the petitioner, the property was also used for paddy cultivation during the period from 1965 to 1972 on the basis of a call made by the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India when there was shortage of food. The petitioner states that, in the settlement register, the property has been described as 'Purayidam'. However, according to the petitioner, on the basis of a mistake in the resurvey it got classified as 'Nil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
