Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
AJU. P. K. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused convicted for cheque dishonor under ni act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court affirms standards for reviewing lower court decisions. (Para 6) |
| 3. revisional jurisdiction defined and limited. (Para 7) |
| 4. final ruling on conviction affirmed. (Para 8) |
| 5. time granted for fine payment and surrender. (Para 9) |
O R D E R
The challenge in this Crl. Revision Petition is to the judgment dated 25.10.2023 in ST. No.276 of 2020 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chottanikkara, which has been confirmed by the Additional Sessions Court – I, Ernakulam, in the judgment dated 7.11.2025 in Crl.Appeal No.470 of 2023.
2. The revision petitioner is the accused. He has been convicted under Section 138 of the NI Act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the Court. He was also directed to pay a fine of Rs.3,00,000/-.
3. The complainant/respondent No.2 filed a complaint before the Trial Court alleging that \
accused/revision petitioner executed Exts.P2 to P4 cheques for a total sum of Rs.3,00,000/. The complainant presented the cheques for encashment. It was dishonoured unpaid due to insufficiency of funds in the account of the accused. Even after the receip
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
