Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
S.SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9592 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.SASINDRAN, SHRI.SATHEESHAN ALAKKADAN
For the Respondents: SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM), SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR, SRI.SABU PULLAN, SRI.GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN, SHRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN, SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN, DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)

A writ petition can be dismissed when the petitioner chooses not to pursue their claim.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging certain revenue records and procedures. The court noted that the petitioner is not pressing the petition and subsequently dismissed it. The primary finding was based on the lack of pursuit by the petitioner. The dismissal occurred as per the petitioner's request.

Result: The Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMK. BABU, JS.SURENDRAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 9592 OF 2024

A writ petition can be dismissed when the petitioner chooses not to pursue their claim.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
S.SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9592 OF 2024