S.SURENDRAN vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6180

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
S.SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.SASINDRAN, SHRI.SATHEESHAN ALAKKADAN
For the Respondents: SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM), SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR, SRI.SABU PULLAN, SRI.GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN, SHRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN, SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN, DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMK. BABU, JS.SURENDRAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
S.SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent