Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAJIB BHUYAN – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER ERNAKULAM FIRST CIRCLE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions for registration of workers. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of workers' employment and applications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. previous court orders impacting current petitions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments and counterarguments presented. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. legal reasoning on registering authority's decisions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. judicial clarification on registration criteria. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. final decision to allow workers' registrations. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in the Writ Petitions are as follows:-
WP(C) No.40686 of 2024
A. Call for the records relating to Exts.P90 and connected similar orders and Exts.P92 to P125 and quash them by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, direction or order;
B. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to allow Exts.P1 to P80 and issue identity cards to the petitioners as per Rule 26(A) (3) of the Rules;
C. Issue a writ of mandamus restraining respondents 2 to 4 from disturbing the work of the petitioners as attached head load workers of their employers in the Urban Wholesale Market Maradu;
WP(C) No.40729 of 2024
A. Call for the records relating to Exts.P25 and c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
