Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAJIB BHUYAN – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER ERNAKULAM FIRST CIRCLE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions for registration of workers. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of workers' employment and applications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. previous court orders impacting current petitions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments and counterarguments presented. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. legal reasoning on registering authority's decisions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. judicial clarification on registration criteria. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. final decision to allow workers' registrations. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
WP(C) No.40686 of 2024
B. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to allow Exts.P1 to P80 and issue identity cards to the petitioners as per Rule 26(A) (3) of the Rules;
WP(C) No.40729 of 2024
B. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to allow Exts.P1 to P23 and issue identity cards to the petitioners as per Rule 26(A) (3) of the Rules;
2. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that petitioner Nos.7, 9, 11, 16, 17, 22, 23, 28, 36, 37, 38, 39, 45, 51, 57 and 72 in WP(C) No.40686 of 2024 and petitioner Nos. 1 and 19 in W.P.(C) No. 40729 of 2024 are not pressing the Writ Petition. WP(C) No.40686 of 2024 is taken as the lead case.
4
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
