IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ROJAN CHERIAN ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER /SUB COLLECTOR, RDO OFFICE, FORT KOCHI P.O ERNAKULAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i) “issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1 st respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 application after obtaining report from the 5 th respondent and in the light of the Judgments in Adani Infrastructures and Developers Pvt.Ltd. V. State Kerala , 2014 (1) KLT 774 , Mureleedharan Nair R V. RDO , 2023 (4 ) KHC 524, Aparna Sasi Menon V. RDO , 2023 (6) KHC 83 and direct to make necessary corrections in Ext P2 data bank by deleting the land mentioned in Ext P3 application.
ii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of this case including the cost of this Writ Petition.
iii) To dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents. .” [sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that Form-5 application submitted by the petitioner is returned back to the petitioner. If that is the case, the petitioner can do the needful and re-present the Form-5 application. If there is any further delay in processing the Form-5 application, the petitioner is free to app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.