ROJAN CHERIAN ABRAHAM vs THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER /SUB COLLECTOR, RDO OFFICE, FORT KOCHI P.O ERNAKULAM

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6189

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ROJAN CHERIAN ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER /SUB COLLECTOR, RDO OFFICE, FORT KOCHI P.O ERNAKULAM – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.K.SOYUZ, SRI.E.V.BABYCHAN
For the Respondents: GP SMT DEEPA V

Table of Content
1. the writ petition addresses procedural issues related to land application. (Para 1)
2. the court emphasizes re-presentation of application if returned. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

i) “issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1 st respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 application after obtaining report from the 5 th respondent and in the light of the Judgments in Adani Infrastructures and Developers Pvt.Ltd. V. State Kerala , 2014 (1) KLT 774 , Mureleedharan Nair R V. RDO , 2023 (4 ) KHC 524, Aparna Sasi Menon V. RDO , 2023 (6) KHC 83 and direct to make necessary corrections in Ext P2 data bank by deleting the land mentioned in Ext P3 application.

ii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of this case including the cost of this Writ Petition.

iii) To dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents. .” [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that Form-5 application submitted by the petitioner is returned back to the petitioner. If that is th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document