Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6196

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
JOSE V.I. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15278 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SREEKANTH K.M., SHRI.ANTONY P.P., SMT.SIYAMOL N.P.
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR, SHRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN, SHRI.NELSON JOSEPH, SRI.M.D.JOSEPH, SHRI.DEEPAK ASHOK KUMAR, SHRI.JESWIN JACOB

The lack of representation by the petitioner results in dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution.

Headnote:The court addressed a writ petition regarding issues of non-representation by the petitioner, referencing procedural norms. It highlighted that the absence of representation on multiple occasions led to a dismissal. The final determination was that the writ petition is dismissed for lack of prosecution.

JUDGMENT

There was no representation for the petitioner when the matter was taken up on the last occasion on 06.12.2025, and today also there was no representation.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-

prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6196

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JJOSE V.I. – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 15278 OF 2024

The lack of representation by the petitioner results in dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
JOSE V.I. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15278 OF 2024