Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JAYACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER KARUR VYSYA BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22878 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.R.MILTON
For the Respondents: P.S.GEORGE

The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner chose not to press it.

Headnote:Writ Petition under WP

(C) NO. 22878 OF 2020 was considered, where the petitioner decided not to press the petition. The court acknowledges the submission and dismisses the petition accordingly. The main issue was the intention of the petitioner regarding the writ petition, resolved by dismissal.

BASANT BALAJI J ======================

W.P. (C) No. 22878 of 2020 ========================

Dated 28^th day of January 2026 JUDGMENT When the Writ Petition is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the writ petition.

Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JJAYACHANDRAN – AppellantVersusTHE AUTHORIZED OFFICER KARUR VYSYA BANK – RespondentWP(C) NO. 22878 OF 2020

The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner chose not to press it.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JAYACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER KARUR VYSYA BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 22878 OF 2020