Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SIDCO EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (AITUC) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sidco's pay scales follow government patterns. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners argue for parity with government payscales. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. past corrections in ktdc support petitioners' claims. (Para 6) |
| 4. petitioners demand continuation of previous payscales. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. court insists no basis to reject sidco's claim. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. court directs government to rectify pay anomalies. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 Petitioners have approached this Court challenging Ext.P11 which rejected the request of the 5th respondent in Exts.P6, P7 and P10 to rectify the anomalies in the scale of pay of LD Clerk, LD Accountant, LD Typist, UD Clerk, UD Accountant, UD Typist and equated posts. Petitioners have also sought for other consequential reliefs.
2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of the writ petition are as follows:-
1st petitioner is a trade union of the employees of SIDCO who is the 4th respondent herein. 2nd petitioner is working as a Junior Accountant in raw material division of the 4th respondent Corporation, and 3rd petitioner is working as UD Clerk in the marketing division of the 4th respondent Corporation. The 4th respondent SIDCO has
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
