Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SIDCO EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (AITUC) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sidco's pay scales follow government patterns. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners argue for parity with government payscales. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. past corrections in ktdc support petitioners' claims. (Para 6) |
| 4. petitioners demand continuation of previous payscales. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. court insists no basis to reject sidco's claim. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. court directs government to rectify pay anomalies. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of the writ petition are as follows:-
3. Petitioners would submit that in the statement enclosed along with Ext.P3 request the 5th respondent committed a mistake in showing the corresponding revised scales with regard to the aforesaid categories. Petitioners would submit that as per Annexure 12 in Ext.P2 schedule of posts and scales of pay (common category) the existing scales of pay and revised scales of UD Clerk, LD Clerk and their equated posts are as follows:-
The 6th respondent as requested in Ext.P3 accorded sanction as per Ext.P5 order for implementing the pay revision 2009 to the employees of the 4th respondent Corporation. But the revision was incorporated in the revised scales of pay which are mistakenly shown in the statem
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
