Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6224

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED MIDLAJ T T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 42032 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: HAMEED SHABLAN, SHIBU V.M., AISWARYA K.S., GOPIKA K.V., SHERIN ANWAR
For the Respondents: THOMAS ABRAHAM, P.C.SASIDHARAN, B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL

A petition is considered infructuous when circumstances change, rendering the original claims irrelevant.

Headnote:The present case involves an application under WP

(C) No. 42032 of 2025, where the petitioner sought relief regarding the matter related to the Keralotsavam 2025 event. The Court, upon hearing, determined the matter to be infructuous based on the submission of the petitioner's counsel. The key issue framed by the Court concerned the relevance of the petitioner's claim due to changes in circumstances. Consequently, the Court concluded that the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6224

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JMUHAMMED MIDLAJ T T – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 42032 OF 2025

A petition is considered infructuous when circumstances change, rendering the original claims irrelevant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED MIDLAJ T T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 42032 OF 2025